The Academy
School VI$147/mo · Cancel anytime

The Grant Writer's Studio

Draft Grants that Score — and WIN!

A rigorous, practitioner-built course that teaches nonprofit and education professionals how to write fundable grant proposals — from dissecting an RFP to submitting a scored, reviewer-ready application. No fluff, no templates: just proven strategy and real feedback.

The Grant Writer's Studio
33
Lessons
9
Modules
9
Weeks

"Whether you are writing municipal, state, or federal grants, every point on that grant's Technical Review Form is either earned or surrendered. My goal is to make sure you earn every single one."

— Mikael Davis

§ What You'll Learn

What you'll be able to do

  • Decode any RFP and extract eligibility rules, scoring criteria, and formatting requirements before writing a word
  • Build a persuasive needs statement integrating local data, national context, and disparity evidence
  • Write fundable, measurable objectives that specify population, percentage target, timeframe, and baseline
  • Design a logic model and operations plan tied directly to documented participant needs
  • Construct a compliant, cost-effective budget with a three-way narrative crosswalk
  • Conduct a pre-submission peer review using a scored rubric — earned versus deducted points
§ The Syllabus

What's inside

9 modules · 33 lessons · Personalized lesson path

01

Mission Alignment & RFP Mastery

Outcome

A completely dissected RFP before any design decision

1.1Mission, Vision, Goals, and the Population You Serve
1.2Reading the Entire RFP Before You Write a Word
1.3Extracting What the Funder Is Really Asking For
02

The Reviewer's Mindset: Scoring and Specificity

Outcome

Radical specificity and zero-inference writing

2.1Proposals Start at Zero: How Every Point Is Earned
2.2If You Don't Tell Them, They Won't Know
2.3Assume Nothing: Closing Every Inferential Gap
2.4Would a Field Reader Call This Strong or Weak?
03

Building a Persuasive Needs Statement

Outcome

A data-rich, locally grounded argument

3.1The Seven Building Blocks: Problem, Evidence, Population, Disparity, Consequence, Need, and Response
3.2Using Data Like a Pro: Multiple Sources, Baselines, and Context
3.3Local Data vs. Institutional Claims: Saying It With Evidence
3.4Qualitative Evidence and the Human Dimension of Need
04

Transforming Data Into Narrative and Program Response

Outcome

Every stat performing a function toward a response

4.1Every Stat Must Perform a Function
4.2From Five Disconnected Stats to One Persuasive Narrative
4.3Designing Activities That Answer What, Who, When, Where, How Often, by Whom, and Why
05

Evidence-Based Program Design and Logic Models

Outcome

A fully specified logic model tied to documented needs

5.1Anatomy of a Logic Model: Inputs, Activities, Outputs, and Outcomes
5.2Translating Student Needs Into Program Elements
5.3Ensuring Every Program Element Traces Back to a Documented Need
06

Writing Fundable, Measurable Objectives

Outcome

Ambitious, baseline-defended, fundable objective statements

6.1Goals vs. Outputs vs. Objectives: Getting the Terminology Right
6.2The Anatomy of a Fundable Objective
6.3From Weak to Fundable: Rewriting Objectives That Lose Points
6.4Defending Ambitiousness: Comparing Objectives Against Baseline Data
07

Operations Plan and Evaluation Design

Outcome

A management and evaluation plan proving capacity

7.1Building an Operations Plan That Proves Capacity
7.2Constructing an Evaluation Plan Around Every Objective
7.3Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation for Accountability and Improvement
7.4Institutional Commitment: Showing the Funder You Can Deliver
08

Budget Development and the Three-Way Crosswalk

Outcome

A compliant budget with narrative, budget, and objectives aligned

8.1Building the Budget From Objectives and Program Design
8.2The Three-Way Crosswalk: Narrative, Budget, and Objectives in Alignment
8.3Writing the Budget Narrative
8.4Finding and Fixing a Flawed Budget
09

Peer Review, Pre-Submission, and Final Submission

Outcome

A reviewer-ready, on-time submission

9.1Scored Peer Review: Earning vs. Deducting Points
9.2Alignment Check: Need, Objectives, Design, Evaluation, and Budget
9.3Pre-Submission Review: Approvals, Attachments, Formatting, and Portal Preparation
9.4Deadline Management, Early Data Collection, and Team Expectations
§ Who It's For

Is this you?

01

First-time grant writer

Handed grant-writing duties with little guidance — needs a rigorous, from-scratch process she can trust.

02

College access coordinator

Writes Title IV and TRIO-adjacent proposals and wants the discipline to move from competitive to consistently funded.

03

Nonprofit program director

Designs strong programs but loses points on paper — needs to translate real capacity into a document that scores.

04

Workforce development manager

Pursues state and federal workforce grants and needs a repeatable process that holds up across funders.

05

Aspiring grants professional

Wants to grow into a dedicated grants role and needs practitioner-level training — not theory.

06

Executive director wearing all hats

Grant writing lands on her desk at a small nonprofit — she needs competitive, compliant submissions without a dedicated team.

§ Questions

Frequently asked

Yes — if you're willing to do the work. The course opens with mission alignment and RFP fundamentals that assume no prior grant-writing experience. Every concept is built up from plain language before it's applied to a real proposal section. That said, this is not a soft introduction: you'll be expected to read RFPs carefully, work with real data, and write sections that could actually be submitted. First-timers who bring seriousness will thrive.

Begin The Grant Writer's Studio

Start with the first free module — risk free. 33 lessons, personalized lesson path, cancel anytime.

Start With the First Free Module · $147/mo